« Ohio Judge Rules in Favor of Raw Milk Farmer, Scolds ODA’s “Failure” to Specify Cow Share Rules | Main | Why "Expensive" Often Doesn't Equal "Quality" in Health Care »

Hell No, We Won't Go (Along with NAIS in Michigan), and Other Farm News

It’s a busy time on the farm these days. A few items:

--There’s this little movement gaining a foothold among Michigan cattle farmers opposed to the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) that I guess you could call the beginnings of civil obedience. The state’s farm grapevine has it that at least some farmers plan to respond to the Michigan Department of Agriculture’s (MDA's) order to affix tags to all cattle by this March 1…by returning the MDA’s order letters to the agency…including a note to this effect: “I choose not to have my premises identified by the government.” (For background on the Michigan order letters, see my BusinessWeek.com column of earlier this month.)

No one farmer wants to be associated with leading the movement, and for good reason: the government has this nasty little habit of picking out individual farmers, and using them as examples to scare everyone else. Witness Richard Hebron, of the Family Farms Cooperative, who drove into a raw-milk sting last October.

--Also today, the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that it is approving cloning of farm animals. It says it can’t find any difference between meat and milk from conventional animals and cloned animals. But we know it can’t be that simple. For now, major food processors are taking a wait-and-see attitude, apparently because much of the rest of the world isn’t nearly as sold on cloning as the FDA. Consumers are also said to be uncomfortable about the idea, but since when does agribusiness care about them?

--And the movement by farmers to sell directly to consumers continues to gain in popularity. I’ve tried to capture the dynamics of this change, from a farmer and business perspective, in my latest BusinessWeek.com column, just posted. The marketplace is making farming ever more attractive as a business, for those farmers willing to wade into the marketplace.

Posted on Thursday, December 28, 2006 at 09:28PM by Registered CommenterThe Complete Patient in | Comments6 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (6)

For anyone interested, you can give your comments to the FDA regarding the food products from cloned animals issue. http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/default.htm The docket number is 2006P-0415. Apparently they will take comments on it for 90 days. I think at this point it may be the labelling issue that is the most important. It seems that there will be animal products from cloned animals, now we just need to make sure that those products are labelled as such.

December 29, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterMH
The reason labeleing of cloned and GMO products is critical is so we can do long term information gatering on the health effects. Only short term studies have been done, and some results are disturbing. The movie "The Future of Food" gives some details on a study that showed damage to mice from GMO potatoes - the researcher was then fired after releasing the info.
Witout labeling, how will anyone ever be able to connect the dots if it turns out there are long term problems?
It may be that the argument that will be listened to is people who have religious or ethical objections to cloning, rather than arguing food safety.
December 29, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterLinda Diane Feldt
One more thing... what about genetic diversity? If all of the cloned animals come from few sources, how will they fight off disease? Wasn't/isn't there a problem with cheetahs being too inbred and having a similar problem?
December 29, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterMH
I posted about the cloned meat announcemtn on my blog and the "virtual ink" was barely dry when the FDA came to visit it. Then that FDA person called me stupid and was very rude in his or her post. This is what they do when they encounter someone who does not have the same opinion as they do.

I am glad to read that there is a movement in Michigan. It worries me when I read headlines like "5000 in Colorado register" or reminders for Wisconsin to adhere to the mandate.

Here in Vermont the Agency of Agriculture did not apply for the Cooperative Agreement grant and so we are without any state level premises registration program. The Agency says there is a voluntary program at the Federal level and they have not removed or updated the webpage about premises registration. The incoming Secretary of Ag, Roger Allbee, said in a Vermont Guardian article that he is not going to push it. Other states, well activists in other states, are looking to Vermont to lead the way to getting out of the system.


December 29, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterHenwhisperer
I was recently at a conference of small farmers and other interested parties to provide local produce to consumers. As I was about to leave a person asked me if I has been impacted by importation? I thought for a moment and then said, "Yes". He handed me a flyer and responded this is for, "Free money". I laughed and responded, "There is NO such thing as FREE money." The whole conference focus was to encourage the struggling small farmer to take the 'financial incentive' of "free money" and unbeknownst to him a contract signing him up for a whole lot more. Google: SF 424B. If you take dollars you agree to implement all points. BTW-All States and Tribes have taken the dollars so you might want to watch them. Say No to NAIS.
December 31, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterCeleste
February 21, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter Ribin

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.